From a personal standpoint I have never viewed Wikipedia as
being a reliable source of information because of the fact that the information
gathered can be changed from seemingly anyone on the web. Coming from high
school into college my teachers and professors would forbid me to use this site
as a relative appropriate source of information.
With that sticking principle, I’ve always learned to never
rely on anything from Wikipedia for educational purposes. On a personal level, I absolutely love
Wikipedia and YouTube. I think these sites are more practical approaches for
obtaining a quick source of information at times.
Many times the information that is gained from these popular
websites in is fact truthful of some sort, but you must always use caution.
More increasingly, it seems that these sites are the “go to” places for many
people.
In this day and age, I would say that I might allow my
students to use this site interchangeably with another. Meaning, I wouldn’t allow
them to obtain information from Wikipedia and YouTube wholly. However, I would
allow them to draw information from these sites to an extent. So, if my
students found information they thought was useful or suitable to the learning
environment, I would ask them to prove these facts by relying on notable fact-finding
sites to obtain greater depths of information. More specifically: news sites .org
sites and any other .edu sites.